Comments on: So Apparently this is how 9-11 Went down.. http://depletedcranium.com/so-apparently-this-is-how-9-11-went-down/ Bad Science And Scary Science Wed, 23 May 2012 23:59:21 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jake http://depletedcranium.com/so-apparently-this-is-how-9-11-went-down/comment-page-1/#comment-2551 Jake Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:23:06 +0000 http://depletedcranium.com/?p=230#comment-2551 I like the poster. But it is lacking a few other conspiracy theories. The biggest one you are leaving out is that a pancake collapse can happen at free fall speed. To do justice to the name "bad science blog", I would think you would point out all the conspiracy theories that were not scientifically possible, hence the name bad science? If you want to do a poster that shows all theories, then do that. If you want to make one that shows all scientifically impossible theories, then do that. But let's be fair here. It is not right to include scientifically justified theories, backed by tons of documented facts and eye witness accounts, in the same poster as implausible and total audacious theories. And like I said before it is not fair to defy the laws of physics and leave out items like free fall speed building collapses and molten metal 5 weeks after the collapse. I would love to know what the maker of this poster thinks of the speed of the collapse, and if they are in support of the government sponsored conspiracy theory. And if so, then where is the bad science which proves that theory? Please post a link to the scientist that has broken Sir Isaac Newton's laws of physics, then by all means lets get them into the science journals ASAP! If we can show a way to manipulate gravity to increase and decrease its force on buildings then we may never even need explosives again to do demolition. We could just increase the gravitational pull on the structure until it gives way and turns into dust before our vary eyes!@##%! I like the poster. But it is lacking a few other conspiracy theories. The biggest one you are leaving out is that a pancake collapse can happen at free fall speed. To do justice to the name “bad science blog”, I would think you would point out all the conspiracy theories that were not scientifically possible, hence the name bad science? If you want to do a poster that shows all theories, then do that. If you want to make one that shows all scientifically impossible theories, then do that. But let’s be fair here. It is not right to include scientifically justified theories, backed by tons of documented facts and eye witness accounts, in the same poster as implausible and total audacious theories. And like I said before it is not fair to defy the laws of physics and leave out items like free fall speed building collapses and molten metal 5 weeks after the collapse. I would love to know what the maker of this poster thinks of the speed of the collapse, and if they are in support of the government sponsored conspiracy theory. And if so, then where is the bad science which proves that theory? Please post a link to the scientist that has broken Sir Isaac Newton’s laws of physics, then by all means lets get them into the science journals ASAP! If we can show a way to manipulate gravity to increase and decrease its force on buildings then we may never even need explosives again to do demolition. We could just increase the gravitational pull on the structure until it gives way and turns into dust before our vary eyes!@##%!

]]> By: Number1BadBoy http://depletedcranium.com/so-apparently-this-is-how-9-11-went-down/comment-page-1/#comment-2147 Number1BadBoy Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:05:59 +0000 http://depletedcranium.com/?p=230#comment-2147 Ha ha! Yeah a lot of that stuff is as far out of whack as the official story. Ha ha! Yeah a lot of that stuff is as far out of whack as the official story.

]]> By: Gravy http://depletedcranium.com/so-apparently-this-is-how-9-11-went-down/comment-page-1/#comment-786 Gravy Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:11:45 +0000 http://depletedcranium.com/?p=230#comment-786 I like it. I like how you mixed all those sites into that one image. Thats exactly how it went down, they say huh? I wonder if Mick Rivero would aggree with you, since you're quoting his site (what really happened dot com) I like it. I like how you mixed all those sites into that one image.

Thats exactly how it went down, they say huh?

I wonder if Mick Rivero would aggree with you, since you’re quoting his site (what really happened dot com)

]]>