So Apparently this is how 9-11 Went down..
November 27th, 2007
|
| Share |
Not to make light of the tragic events of that day but I’d like to point out how the conspiracy theories just get more and more ridiculous as time goes on. While the CT’ers are certainly entitled to their opinions and can lie all they want, the evidence has been relatively lacking on their side. Hence, I see no reason to treat their “opinion” with any more respect than holocaust deniers.
As absurd as the above diagram is, which does not even include the pentagon attack or other aspects of the various “theories” out there, this is entirely based on actual conspiracy theory websites:
http://www.nucleardemolition.com
http://www.baywolf.net/VoxPopOct06.htm
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id472.html
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com
http://www.rense.com/general76/missing.htm
http://www.postchronicle.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=32&num=103433
http://www.arsenalofhypocrisy.com/911/9-11_Truth.htm
http://www.911researchers.com
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hoax.html
This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 27th, 2007 at 2:39 pm and is filed under Bad Science, Conspiracy Theories, Not Even Wrong, Obfuscation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
View blog reactions
December 13th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
I like it. I like how you mixed all those sites into that one image.
Thats exactly how it went down, they say huh?
I wonder if Mick Rivero would aggree with you, since you’re quoting his site (what really happened dot com)
Quote Comment
February 6th, 2008 at 7:05 am
Ha ha! Yeah a lot of that stuff is as far out of whack as the official story.
Quote Comment
February 17th, 2008 at 11:23 am
I like the poster. But it is lacking a few other conspiracy theories. The biggest one you are leaving out is that a pancake collapse can happen at free fall speed. To do justice to the name “bad science blog”, I would think you would point out all the conspiracy theories that were not scientifically possible, hence the name bad science? If you want to do a poster that shows all theories, then do that. If you want to make one that shows all scientifically impossible theories, then do that. But let’s be fair here. It is not right to include scientifically justified theories, backed by tons of documented facts and eye witness accounts, in the same poster as implausible and total audacious theories. And like I said before it is not fair to defy the laws of physics and leave out items like free fall speed building collapses and molten metal 5 weeks after the collapse. I would love to know what the maker of this poster thinks of the speed of the collapse, and if they are in support of the government sponsored conspiracy theory. And if so, then where is the bad science which proves that theory? Please post a link to the scientist that has broken Sir Isaac Newton’s laws of physics, then by all means lets get them into the science journals ASAP! If we can show a way to manipulate gravity to increase and decrease its force on buildings then we may never even need explosives again to do demolition. We could just increase the gravitational pull on the structure until it gives way and turns into dust before our vary eyes!@##%!
Quote Comment