Newtown Connecticut Shooting Spawns Conspiracy Theories

January 19th, 2013

Share

The shooting that occurred in Newtown, CT took the lives of 27, plus the shooter himself.  Most of the victims were young children.   For a small town in a small state, the loss and grief is enormous.   In time, the event will fade from the headlines, but for the community, the tragedy will linger much longer.  It will likely be more than a year before the town even begins to return to normal and the shooting stops dominating the lives of those who live in the area.  Of course, for those who lost loved ones, things never really will return to normal.  The grief will be life-long and time will only dull, but never remove the sense of loss.

Unfortunately, the process of recovering from the horrible tragic events of December 14 has only been made worse by the rise of conspiracy theories and the invasive and disrespectful actions of conspiracy theorists and self-pointed “investigators.”

The conspiracy theories basically claim one of three things:

  1. Adam Lanza was somehow under the control of the government or that his actions were the result of government influences
  2. Adam Lanza was not the murderer.  He was just a scapegoat and the deaths were actually purported by the government.   Some claim Adam Lanza was not even a real person or that he had died some time ago and the identity was assumed into the fictional character created to be the perpetrator.
  3. The shooting never happened.  It was all staged.  The victims may not even be real people at all, but just characters made up for the false story.

The motives put forward for such a conspiracy are predictable: that the massacre would result in an outcry for more school security, more gun control and more law enforcement powers and that this would allow the government to take away rights from the people to a degree that would not otherwise be accepted.  Some claim that other recent shootings, such as the one in Aurora Colorado are proof that the government has begun a program of planned or staged massacres with the intention of convincing the public to submit to greater government authority, ultimately leading to all out fascism.

The claims of “evidence” of a conspiracy vary considerably. One of the most common claims is that the reports are conflicting or that the information given does not fit the events. Indeed, early news reports did indicate everything from the possibility of a second shooter to the suspect apparently being apprehended. Recordings of two-way radio traffic demonstrate that police officers may have believed that the suspect had fled or that the circumstances were different. This is very typical for such a chaotic and sudden event. It did indeed take some time to ascertain the actual circumstances. Others are that apparent victims have been seen alive or that some of those killed or involved have some kind of connection to the government.

Via Yahoo News:

Latest American conspiracy theory claims Newtown mass shooting a hoax
WASHINGTON – The United States has long been a breeding ground for conspiracy theorists, spurred by an often violent history riddled, in particular, with shadowy political assassinations.

But the latest conspiracy movement seems custom-made to underscore the need for a national debate on mental illness. Some of the Sandy Hook Truthers, as they’ve been dubbed, believe last month’s mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., was a hoax.

The Obama administration perpetrated the hoax, the conspiracy theorists claim, in order to ratchet up support for tougher gun control measures.

They call themselves Operation Terror, and many of the movement’s adherents appear to have ties to the so-called 9-11 truthers who have long held that the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were an inside job by the George W. Bush administration.

Their theories on the Dec. 14 shooting in Sandy Hook appear to lack any basis in fact, reality or common sense. But Google Trends suggests the movement is gaining momentum with both a Florida college professor and a libertarian Fox News anchor in Cincinnati questioning the official narrative on the events.

On various websites and blogs, some Sandy Hook truthers crow about the “smoking gun” they say proves the shooting was a hoax — a photo of President Barack Obama, backstage at a Newtown vigil two days after the shooting, a young blonde girl sitting on his lap.

They insist the girl is six-year-old Emilie Parker, one of the 20 child victims of the shooting. The Sandy Hook truthers claim her parents slipped up in their participation in the hoax, and allowed their eldest daughter to cuddle up to Obama.

“The story that she was killed at Sandy Hook is not possible, because here she is sitting on the president’s lap after the shooting,” intones the narrator of a YouTube video, one of dozens of its kind, this one the recipient of more than 260,000 web hits.

In fact, it’s the dead girl’s little sister.

Although I doubt my word will count for much, I can assure readers that Emilie Parker was real and died that day. No, I did not know her or her family, but I know people who do, and unless I have several personal friends and acquaintances who are already deeply involved in the conspiracy, she did indeed loose her life.

Many of the conspiracy theorists are of the standard variety:  the same group that claims 9/11 was an inside job and spends most of their time listening to Alex Jones and posting on various conspiracy-oriented boards and making poorly edited youtube videos. However, one of them has gained more attention because of his background as a professor. James Tracy, a professor at Florida Atlantic University, has become the most prominent mouthpiece for conspiracy theorists with his accusations that the entire event was staged and his pledge to personally investigate the circumstances. Later, he did concede that some people died, but maintains that the scale and circumstances are false and the shooting was caused by a massive conspiracy.


Via the Daily Mail:

Conspiracy theory professor who said Sandy Hook tragedy never happened NOW concedes some ‘people undoubtedly died

The so-called ‘Nutty Professor’ who said the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting never happened is now willing to concede some people, indeed, lost their lives in the tragedy.

But James Tracy, a Florida Atlantic University tenured communications professor, is only seemingly willing to meet his many detractors half-way in their demands for outright contrition.

‘There are certainly people that lost their loved ones, there is no doubt of that,’ Tracy tells WLRN in Miami.

‘If a similar tragedy were visited upon me and my family, I would be beside myself,’ he reportedly said.

‘But I think one of my ways of healing would be attempting to find out what went wrong, where was the failure.’

The 47-year-old professor suggested on his blog – memoryholeblog.com – the massacre at the least did not unfold in the way authorities said it did, and may not have happened at all.

‘While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place—at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described,’ he wrote.

‘As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends,’ he wrote on his blog.

Tracy has seemingly based his allegations largely on the flurry of conflicting media reports released during the hectic day.

Tracy is a professor of communications.  He has academic tenure, and this puts Florida Atlantic University in a difficult position. Academic tenure prevents schools from terminating or taking action against professors except in specific circumstances, where they have directly violated contractual obligations – such as not showing up for classes or failing to do other basic duties of their job or engaging in directly inappropriate behavior. Tenure exists for a reason: its purpose is to foster a free and open academic environment, where professors do not need to worry about university politics interfering with their ability to freely teach, publish and conduct research.

Unfortunately, in circumstances like that of Tracy, tenure can result in a university being unable to dismiss a faculty member who is an embarrassment to the institution. FAU would just as soon wash its hands of the “nutty professor” and many are outraged by the fact that he is receiving money from a taxpayer-funded institution.   An investigation has been opened by the university, but it’s not entirely clear whether they will be able to make a case for his termination. Tracy has been asked to resign and has refused.

With or without Tracy at the head, there is clearly a growing group of “Newtown Shooting Truthers” who will not go away.   A youtube search shows hundreds of videos on the subject have already been posted.

Here is one example, pretty typical of the kind of videos and claims being made:



So what we have here is a combination of errors made by the news media early on and a few made by officials (for example, the medical examiner who was under the impression that a different gun was used, although at the time the ballistic evidence had not been processed and the investigation was only begining.) We also see images of parents and others reacting to the shock of the events with confused emotions.

In fact, during times of extreme emotional stress, shock and grief, it is quite normal for individuals to show confused and rapidly changing emotions. In such high stress situations, it is quite normal to see people go from completely composed to crying hysterically and back again in a brief period of time. While it may seem highly inappropriate, laughter and apparently being happy is a well known phenomena seen in those who are first dealing with loss. Some of these initial responses are simply the brain trying to deal with a severe emotional overload.

(click here if your browser does not support embedded videos)

Newtown locals and families of victims being harassed:

Being accused of being part of a conspiracy or having their recent losses and trauma questioned is difficult enough for those close to the shooting.

Many of the conspiracy theorists have targeted 69 year old Gene Rosen, a retired psychologist living in Newtown.  Rosen lives a short distance from the Sandy Hook school.  On the morning of the shooting, he was coming out of his garage, where he had been feeding his cats, when he saw a group of six young children sitting on his lawn and one adult standing over them, in an apparently frantic state.  The six children were students at Sandy Hook Elementary School, who had fled the school when the shooting occurred and the adult was a school bus driver who had ushered the children away from the school to the relative safety of the nearby residential neighborhood.   The six children were the only survivors from Victoria Soto’s classroom, where their teacher and other classmates were all shot dead.

Rosen did what any reasonable human would do.  He invited the children and the bus driver into his home and attempted to provide them with some comfort, offering them juice and his grandchildrens’ stuffed animals while he called the authorities.  The school bus driver contacted the busing company, which was able to provide the cell phone numbers of the student’s parents.   The children were sheltered at the home for about an hour and a half before their parents were located and came to pick them up.   Shortly after the last child was picked up, the parents of one of the deceased children knocked at Rosen’s door, having heard that some of the children had fled to his home and hoping that their son might be amongst those who had survived.

As one might expect, Rosen has been deeply impacted by the shock and trauma of that day and being thrust into the media spotlight by no choice of his own.  He has generally been commended for his actions, although he has been dismissive of being called a hero, instead pointing to the bravery of the children who maintained their composure and stayed together after escaping the school.  Unfortunately, Mr. Rosen has also become the target of numerous conspiracy theorists, who have gone so far as to harass him in person.

Via Salon.com

Gene Rosen sheltered six kids during the Sandy Hook massacre. Now he’s become a target of conspiracy theorists

“I don’t know what to do,” sighed Gene Rosen. “I’m getting hang-up calls, I’m getting some calls, I’m getting emails with, not direct threats, but accusations that I’m lying, that I’m a crisis actor, ‘how much am I being paid?’” Someone posted a photo of his house online. There have been phony Google+ and YouTube accounts created in his name, messages on white supremacist message boards ridiculing the “emotional Jewish guy,” and dozens of blog posts and videos “exposing” him as a fraud. One email purporting to be a business inquiry taunted: “How are all those little students doing? You know, the ones that showed up at your house after the ‘shooting’. What is the going rate for getting involved in a gov’t sponsored hoax anyway?”

“The quantity of the material is overwhelming,” he said. So much so that a friend shields him from most of it by doing daily sweeps of the Web so Rosen doesn’t have to. His wife is worried for their safety. He’s logged every email and every call, and consulted with a retired state police officer, who took the complaint seriously but said police probably can’t do anything at the moment; he plans to do the same with the FBI.

The harassment has gotten far worse than just phone calls and e-mails, however. A number of conspiracy theorists have gone out of their way to post his personal information online, including his address, personal telephone number and information about his family.   There are some Youtube videos that show his info and how to get to his home.  I will not post them, but they are easy enough to find.   Mr. Rosen has been harassed so badly he now worries about his own safety, given the fact that his address has been so widely published.   After retirement, Rosen had earned extra income by running a pet-sitting business, but his website has been flooded by harassing e-mails disguised as requests for pet sitting services.

While Gene Rosen may be the most visible victim of harassment, he is not the only one.  The families of the victims have kept quiet about the extent to which they have been harassed, and the Connecticut State police have worked to shield their privacy and assure their safety, but a few family members have also been targeted. The fact that most of the families were previously low profile, and thus did not make any effort to have unlisted phone numbers and hidden their addresses can make this difficult.

Robbie Parker, who lost his daughter Emilie has been singled out by a number of conspiracy theorists.  A video called “Robbie Parker Exposed” has gone viral. (no I won’t link to it)  On some websites, extreme conspiracy theorists have called for an “open bounty” on Robbie Parker – an extremely disturbing and directly threatening action.   Others who have been the subject of harassment and accusations include Jimmy Greene and Nelba Marquez-Greene, who lost their daughter Ana and Nicole Holkey, who lost her son DylanThe family and friends of teacher Victoria Soto, who died in the attack have also been accused of being part of a conspiracy. Not surprisingly, Adam Lanza’s father and extended family have kept a very low profile and received protection due to concern over threats.

The fact that so many are facing harassment is deeply disturbing and the possibility that they may be in danger of violence makes it even worse.

It is important to remember that everyone responds to this kind of shock and grief differently, and their reaction cannot be used as evidence of anything.   For some, the experience is so shocking that they show little emotion at first or seem to respond with an unexpected lack of sorrow.  Others become immediately emotional.  For some, the tragic events may make them feel a drive to activism or to speak out for policy changes.

Of course, many will avoid the media spotlight and try to maintain their privacy, but it is also not unusual for those who have experienced loss to actively seek the opertunity to speak publicly about their loved one.  This is especially true of parents.  Having lost a child who they were so proud of, they may feel a deep desire to let the world know how great they believed their child was and to memorialize their loved ones publicly.  Some wish to be completely alone and others want constant support and companionship.

None of these responses are wrong, inappropriate or evidence of deception.  Regardless of how they have reacted to the death of loved ones, those involved in the Sandy Hook shooting should have their wishes respected and be left alone unless they indicate a desire to be contacted.   These conspiracy theories are especially shameful.  Hopefully those who crossed the line to direct harassment and threats will be dealt with severely by law enforcement.

NOTE:  There are a few major sites now dedicated to this conspiracy theory.   You can easily find them with Google if you wish.


This entry was posted on Saturday, January 19th, 2013 at 7:04 pm and is filed under Bad Science, Conspiracy Theories, Culture, Events, media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
View blog reactions

27 Responses to “Newtown Connecticut Shooting Spawns Conspiracy Theories”

  1. 1
    Gordon Says:

    I am familiar with the idea of responding to loss with strange and unexpected emotions.

    My father died at a strange time. He was in his 80′s and he had prostate cancer, so we knew he would not last forever, but the cancer was growing very slowly and the doctors felt it would not become critical for years. We were still very concerned, but he went to the doctor and came back with the news that the tumor had not grown at all since his last exam. We all were very relieved and assumed that meant he would live some time longer. Then he died of a heart attack a week later, which was a bad twist after breathing a sigh of relief.

    When my mother called me at work I can honestly say I felt no emotion and I carried on about my job and went home. It was not until the end of the next day that it dawned on me that my father was dead. It seemed to come all at once. I felt very bad though, like I was wrong or did not care for him enough for not being sad right away.

    My mother reacted in a way that shocked some people. She would recall the things he did and laugh and smile and even make strange jokes about the irony of him dying just when we thought he was okay. She seemed unnaturally cheerful and then she would suddenly go into fits of hysterical crying and then recover almost as quickly. It was very strange to see her smiling like that and then lose it completely.

    The problem is everyone expects people to cry as soon as they hear the news and to consistently show sadness and most people don’t. Most people become very confused and don’t know how to feel and we treat them with suspicion.

    IN this case, it must make things very hard for the parents to see their expression of their loss being called into question.


    Quote Comment
  2. 2
    BMS Says:

    Well, it appears that the Newtown Connecticut shooting has spawned all sorts of emotional stuff. Let’s hope that sober judgement and rational thinking wins out in the end.

    Meanwhile, all that can be done is to express our sympathy to those who lost loved ones in this horrific event.

    Personally, I find it despicable that anyone would use this tragedy as an opportunity to push forward some sort of long-held agenda, whether it involves some sort of conspiracy theory or not.


    Quote Comment
  3. 3
    Q Says:

    Conspiracy theorists love to pick on any ordinary person who happens to be in a place where they witness something that goes against what the CT’ers want it to be.

    It is an easier target for them than going after the government or officials and they seem to think if they can crack someone they will prove everything.

    How many times do you hear about this? A person who narrowly escaped the World Trade Center on 9/11 or a witness to the JFK assassination or one of the engineers who worked on the APollo program. They all become the butt of conspiracy theorists harassment. It’s how they work. Its like these people are proxies for the new world order to the truthers.


    Quote Comment
  4. 4
    DV82XL Says:

    An excellent book called Empire of Conspiracy by Tim Melley explores the issue of conspiracy theories and offers a compelling explanation of why they manifest after every major event. He explains why conspiracy theories have become so pervasive in recent decades as a form of cultural paranoia driven by feelings of disempowerment.

    Melley proposes that conspiracy thinking arises from a combination of two factors, when someone: 1) holds strong individualist values and 2) lacks a sense of control. The first attribute refers to people who believe deeply in an individual’s right to make their own choices and direct their own lives without interference or obligations to a larger system (like the government). But combine this with a sense of powerlessness in their own life, and you get what he calls “agency panic”, an intense anxiety about an apparent loss of autonomy to outside forces. When fervent individualists feel that they cannot exercise their independence, they experience a crisis and assume that larger forces are to blame for usurping this freedom. It really doesn’t matter at this point what the event is their natural inclination is to see it through the lens of this fear and a conspiracy theory is born.

    I highly recommend the book to anyone wishing to dig into the underlying psychology of conspiracy theory in general.


    Quote Comment
  5. 5
    Q Says:

    DV8: What would be your suggestion for combating this kind of thing?

    It sounds like this is now more than an academic problem. You have people being harassed and having their addresses published for people to bother them, and it sounds like the local police are running up a very high bill paying for all the extra officers needed to keep it in check.


    Quote Comment
  6. 6
    DG Says:

    While I don’t think there’s a massive conspiracy/coverup – even Newtown would require a degree of close-mouthedness and competence that the government STILL hasn’t shown (Waco, Ruby Ridge, Fast and Furious).

    Sadly, it’s not too far a stretch from Fast and Furious to something like this, in a “can you believe someone would actually DO that” kind of way.


    Quote Comment
  7. 7
    DV82XL Says:

            Q said:

    DV8: What would be your suggestion for combating this kind of thing?

    I don’t think there is much that can be done to ameliorate this type of thing because its roots are largely cultural. In fact I am not sure that any collective action would not be seen as a conspiracy in and of itself.

    Having said that, we can also make the general observation that those with more education tend not to fall into the intellectual trap of seeing conspiracy and coverup at every turn, so one might suppose that better schooling of the young might lessen the problem in time.


    Quote Comment
  8. 8
    TomT Says:

    I’m always fascinated at the conspiracy theory’s that crop up after a horrific event. It appears that there are people, not just individualists by the way, who can’t handle the idea that random bad things happen. I think that it reassures them on some level if they can blame the event on the government. I’m still find it weird that someone would find a conspiracy run by the government reassuring but it soothe something in their psychology.

    Mind you it doesn’t help that there are actual conspiracies out there though none of them actually appear very competent when you look at them and actual conspiracies leak like a sieve. For that matter the government has never appeared to be that competent at running anything so why would they be more competent at running a conspiracy.


    Quote Comment
  9. 9
    drbuzz0 Says:

            TomT said:

    I’m still find it weird that someone would find a conspiracy run by the government reassuring but it soothe something in their psychology.

    If it is a government conspiracy then it is, at least in principle, stoppable. There is an entity that makes these things happen. You have an enemy to fight. If you could prove it is true and spur a revolt, then perhaps the evil doers could be rooted out and then this kind of thing would not happen again.

    If it is NOT the government then you have to admit that individuals will, from time to time, act out and do horrible things that cause great harm to others.

    This is unstoppable. There is no enemy to fight. Adam Lanza is dead and can’t be brought to justice. The next person who will do this is unknown and could be anyone. If it’s just individuals acting on their own, then you can’t stop it – at least not 100%.

    If there are people who wish to do evil and harm others, nothing will ever stop that completely. You can institute gun control, armed guards, secure school doors, mental health services, more police officers, etc etc etc. None of this will stop 100% of individuals who are determined to cause harm.

    It is well established that a person who is determined to kill others and fears neither death nor capture is an extremely difficult thing to stop.


    Quote Comment
  10. 10
    Anon Says:

            DV82XL said:

    I don’t think there is much that can be done to ameliorate this type of thing because its roots are largely cultural. In fact I am not sure that any collective action would not be seen as a conspiracy in and of itself.

    You can bet.

    Though harassment laws should be used against those who take it too far, sure the crazies will think we’re going after them, but the rest of the population will understand and it might scare a few of the them.


    Quote Comment
  11. 11
    pdxskeptic Says:

    You will enjoy this rant against the conspiracy theorists, its awesome:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=smX9P7zXwAc


    Quote Comment
  12. 12
    PsihoKekec Says:

    Idiocy of conspiracy nuts never ceases to amaze me.
    But there is a method to this madness. Aldous Huxley wrote that happiness is nothing compared to doomed fight against the fate. Conspiracy nuts could have been happy with their lives, but they chose the doomed fight against the imaginary all powerful enemy for it makes them the hero of their story, it elevates them above those they consider sheeple. These days people grow up with strong sense of entitlement, that sooner or later hits the brick wall of reality and conspiracy theories provide easy explanation why reality does not conform to our estimation of selfworth. And the internet does a great job of connecting the like minded, spreading the malaise of lunatic fringe.
    It’s easier to believe in shadow organization, led by evil overlord, you can thwart or overthrow, than it is to believe in human nature and cyclical repetition of humanities follies.


    Quote Comment
  13. 13
    DV82XL Says:

            PsihoKekec said:

    Conspiracy nuts could have been happy with their lives, but they chose the doomed fight against the imaginary all powerful enemy for it makes them the hero of their story, it elevates them above those they consider sheeple.

    Excellent observation and very likely valid for most that are manifesting these delusions.


    Quote Comment
  14. 14
    John Ball Says:

    I see that all the usual neoliberal and neocon CONUS suspects are bloviating once more while whistling desperately in the dark against the GFC 2007 – to date. If the government is always benevolent, if voting in N American elections still means anything even if voting machines have destroyed any audit trails, then of course any deviations are entertained only by the certifiably mad AKA conspiracy theorists.

    But if conversely there is NDAA, if there is no habeas corpus any more, if CONUS nationals can be murdered at will by POTUS and incarcerated for any amount of time by his military, if the real unemployment in a country whose oligarchic govt. routinely fakes the figures is 23% (for evidence consult Shadow Statistics website) then keep whistling, people, you are gojng down big time.

    Fact: CIA recommended (Google the facsimile FOIA document) to stress use of “conspiracy theorist” in the public realm to counteract the alleged “lone gunman” “nonsense” of the Warren Commission, hence this double noun is CONUS regime propaganda since the late 60s.

    Fact: conspiracy is an actionable offence, known in the USA as “racketeering”.

    Fact: any time the cops investigate a crime scene with more than 1 suspect, they form a conspiracy theory, which they then refine to build a case.

    Fact: CONUS denizens plus willing Canuck appendages instantly attribute “conspiracy” to any single action of an official enemy without hesitation, e.g. Putin’s alleged false flag bombing of Russian apartments to justify Chechen War II or the Beslan massacre (see the tone of the Wikipedia entry on “Beslan” in US-English for evidence of this). Conversely, between 1964 and 2003, when Mcnamara admitted the fact before he finally died, any NATO lover who said that “Gulf of Tonkin” attack by N. Vietnam never happened was a “conspiracy theorist”. See also Pearl Harbour; US/UK subs false flagging the Swedish coast in the 80s under Reagan/Thatcher to scare the Swedish voters into opposing Olaf Palme (admitted by Caspar Weinberger prior to his death; see relevant Youtube interview), etc.

    Fact: the ca. 2,000 mainly CONUS architects and engineers whose Architects and Engineers DVD for 911 Truth made it onto a PBS show recently have forgotten more math and physics and engineering than the sum total of the supine slavish scribbling on this self-styled Refuge of Rationality ever knew. And it shows.

    It is thus clear whose Crania are Depleted.


    Quote Comment
  15. 15
    DV82XL Says:

            John Ball said:

    It is thus clear whose Crania are Depleted.

    Yea, verily…


    Quote Comment
  16. 16
    Shafe Says:

            John Ball said:

    Fact: the ca. 2,000 mainly CONUS architects and engineers whose Architects and Engineers DVD for 911 Truth made it onto a PBS show recently have forgotten more math and physics and engineering than the sum total of the supine slavish scribbling on this self-styled Refuge of Rationality ever knew. And it shows.

    Just a small point… while an engineering/architecture education will generally screen out those who have no capacity to understand math and basic physics, it does little to ensure that graduates have a rational worldview. And it would not be hard at all to find 2000 architects and engineers who reside at the low end of the bell curve of technical expertise in materials properties and failure mechanisms.

    I’m sure that, like myself, there are numerous engineers here who have worked with a few.


    Quote Comment
  17. 17
    I'mnotreallyhere Says:

            John Ball said:

    CONUS

    ??

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conus ?


    Quote Comment
  18. 18
    Chuck P. Says:

    I think he means CONtinental United States, but I don’t know why he’s excluding Alasksa and Hawaii.


    Quote Comment
  19. 19
    Will Says:

            PsihoKekec said:

    Conspiracy nuts could have been happy with their lives, but they chose the doomed fight against the imaginary all powerful enemy for it makes them the hero of their story, it elevates them above those they consider sheeple.

    This observation is clearly vindicated in John Ball’s semi-pedantic and condescending ramble. He certainly doesn’t talk like one bent on conversation or promoting some “urgent truth”. Instead he proselytizes like he is some savant with knowledge we will never be intelligent enough to understand. It amazes me that there are so many shallow people that need their egos stroked in such a juvenile and contemptible manner.


    Quote Comment
  20. 20
    TBR News » TBR News January 30, 2013 Says:

    [...] Newtown Connecticut Shooting Spawns Conspiracy Theories [...]


    Quote Comment
  21. 21
    dis Says:

    please explain obama taking photos with the “alleged” dead girl that was seemingly shot at this school by the same gun that was locked inside the a trunk of a car


    Quote Comment
  22. 22
    drbuzz0 Says:

            dis said:

    please explain obama taking photos with the “alleged” dead girl that was seemingly shot at this school by the same gun that was locked inside the a trunk of a car

    Nobody was shot by the gun left in the car. There were multiple guns and not all were taken into the school. You are basing that on early reports of what weapon was used, which were not accurate.

    You are talking about Emilie Parker, who did die in the shooting. Obama is pictured with her sister, who does indeed have a strong resemblance to her, especially when compared to older photos, which are what have been used to “prove” that it’s the same girl. It’s not, and if not for the fact that conspiracy theorists pick a two year old photo, that would be obvious.


    Quote Comment
  23. 23
    Maci Jay Says:

            BMS said:

    Well, it appears that the Newtown Connecticut shooting has spawned all sorts of emotional stuff. Let’s hope that sober judgement and rational thinking wins out in the end.

    Meanwhile, all that can be done is to express our sympathy to those who lost loved ones in this horrific event.

    Personally, I find it despicable that anyone would use this tragedy as an opportunity to push forward some sort of long-held agenda, whether it involves some sort of conspiracy theory or not.

    Said perfectly.. Sickening that people twist stuff to get a rise out of people.


    Quote Comment
  24. 24
    B looking Says:

    Thank you John Ball, for a minute there I thought this website had to be set up by the government as part of the anti conspiracy conspiracy.


    Quote Comment
  25. 25
    quintin Says:

    suck my balls


    Quote Comment
  26. 26
    Shafe Says:

    Touché!


    Quote Comment
  27. 27
    wow gold Says:

    Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to assert
    that I get in fact enjoyed account your blog posts.
    Any way I will be subscribing to your feeds and even
    I achievement you access consistently fast.


    Quote Comment

Leave a Reply

Current month ye@r day *

Please copy the string Toq7UE to the field below:

*

Protected by WP Anti Spam