Railroad Crossings: The Trouble With Idiots
Thursday, October 13th, 2011I started thinking about this topic after the discussion on an other post regarding loss of electricity turned to railroad crossings (grade crossings), where railways intersect roadways. Understandably, loss of power for warning signals can result in some safety problems.
Unfortunately, adding entirely redundant backup power to railroad crossing warning systems wouldn’t actually address the real safety problem with railroad crossings: idiots. It’s really not hard to avoid being killed at a railroad crossing. If there’s a train coming, don’t enter the crossing. If there isn’t a train coming, it’s safe to cross. It’s not hard to tell if a train is approaching either. Most crossings have signals, such as flashing lights and gates to make it obvious, but even if the crossing lacks signals or the signals don’t work, it’s still fairly obvious. Trains are generally required to blow their horn when approaching a railroad crossing, so if you’re about to go over a railroad crossing and hear a train horn, look both ways, because it’s possible that the signals are not functioning.
Seems simple, right? After all, stopping at a railroad crossing to let a train pass is only going to cost you, at worst, a few minutes, and cutting in front of a train is not a good way to keep yourself alive. It’s impossible for the train to stop in time to avoid a collision, and it certainly can’t swerve out of the way. Estimating the speed and distance of something like an approaching locomotive can be surprisingly difficult, especially when you’re also moving. If you’re wrong and that train hits, it’s not going to do just superficial damage.
Despite these seemingly obvious facts, grade crossings claim a surprising number of lives. In the US alone, hundreds die in grade crossing accidents every year – 247 in the year 2009 and 338 in 2007. The problem is not confined to the US, of course. Everywhere that grade crossings exist, there are deaths on a fairly regular basis.
Supporters of Social Darwinism might suggest that this is not such a bad thing, since it’s generally the fault of the idiot driver who gets killed, but the problem is more broad than that. Despite the fact that locomotives tend to be a lot larger and sturdier than road vehicles, they can and do get badly damaged by striking cars and trucks. Debris can fly up and injure train crew. On occasion, trains have even derailed due to grade-crossing accidents. Even if the accident does not cause any significant damage to the train, it still means that it has to come to a stop, the crossing ends up being blocked for some time and emergency services need to respond to clean up the mess. And the idiots who try to beat the train are actually more likely to survive with injuries than die outright. Add to this the fact that there may be other passengers in the vehicle who had no control over the situation and it’s easy to see why this is a major social problem.














