Archive for the ‘Depleted Cranium’ Category

Can you help identify this image?

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Recent a depleted uranium debunker sent me a link to this news story “Iraq: Depleted Uranium Babies.“    It’s not surprising to see yet another trumped up and unfounded news story about the supposed effects of depleted uranium, but this one stirs up one sore spot.   There is a photo which is commonly used in claims about depleted uranium.  Like many images, it’s not what it seems, but the source is still not known.   In the past, other reputed photos of depleted uranium-enduced deformitives turned out to be taken in the US in the 1950’s, pulled from medical textbooks or from a museum in Bangkok.

The above image has been reported to show a child in Iraq after the US invasion.  It’s also been claimed that it shows a child in Kosovo or Bosnia, in Afghanistan or a victim of the Chernobyl event from Ukraine or Belarus.    These claims, however are false.

Perhaps you’ve seen this photo somewhere or can help trace it to its original source. Here is what we know:

(more…)

2009 at Depleted Cranium

Friday, January 1st, 2010

The Depleted Cranium 2009  year in review

The Hypocrisy of Greenpeace Illustrated - Most visited post of the year and the most discussed, with a total of 144 comments

Get your damn symbols right! – Surprisingly, this one was the second place for the most visited post of the year, although not nearly as discussed, with only 36 comments.

How Homeopathy (Supposedly) Works Illustrated - Not quite at the top in terms of most visits (although it was posted relatively late in the year)  However, this post stands out as having the most link-backs of any post in DC history and has an astounding 77 Facebook links and 47 tweets and re-tweets

The Top Ten Things Environmentalists Need to Learn – Not as popular in 2009 as it was when it was first published, nearly two years ago, but this post continues to rank in the top ten and is the all time most visited and most commented post.

Depleted Uranium for Dinner – The most popular and commented post of a youtube video.   However, this was followed closely by Apollo 11 First Steps, High Quality 16mm DAC.

Visitor loyalty was above average for a blog.   More than 10% of visitors were considered “regular,” having visited several pages over the course of months.    Visitor retention was also above average, with most staying for two minutes or more.

The most prolific commenter was DV82XL.

Traffic:

The largest refereeing sites to Depleted Cranium for 2009, not including search engines are (in order of visitors):

stumbleupon.com
randi.org
thoriumenergy.blogspot.com

About 40% of visitors came from a refering site, about 30% came from search engines and about 30% came directly to Depleted Cranium in 2009.

The most common word entered into a search engine to find this site was “Organic.”   Over six thousand visitors to this site got her by searching for the word “organic” or a phrase containing it.

(more…)

Questions Answered For Utah’s Radiation Control Board

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Apparently the Utah Radiation Control Board has some questions about Depleted Uranium.  Like any government agency, they’ve put together a committee tasked with taking as long as possible to come up with nothing in the way of clear answers.   Thus, I’ll cut the whole thing short and give them all the answers they need:

Via the Salt Lake Tribune:

Is depleted uranium too hot for Utah site?

No.

Utah’s Radiation Control Board will dig deeper into the long-term risks of depleted uranium before it decides whether the unusual form of low-level radioactive waste warrants a moratorium.

But an attorney for EnergySolutions Inc. cautioned board members about legal and technical challenges they will face if they try banning depleted uranium temporarily or permanently.

“It’s a fairly high bar” for the board to justify a moratorium, said attorney James Holtkamp.

If you’re looking to ban depleted uranium on the grounds of safety from radiation then the answer is simple: lie. That’s the only way you can get it done. The facts are not on your side thus you simply will have to make untrue statements.
Board members said they would rather have waited for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to wrap up its own in-depth study

Waiting for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission? You will be waiting a long long long time.  The NRC has a way of not getting useful things done… ever

how much DU, as its called, can be safely buried in a shallow disposal site like EnergySolutions’ mile-square landfill in Tooele County.

However much will fit

(more…)

Israel Denies Using Depleted Uranium in Gaza, Why does it matter?

Thursday, January 22nd, 2009

Via Reuters:

JERUSALEM, Jan 21 (Reuters) – Israel denied on Wednesday its armed forces used ordnance with depleted uranium during the Gaza Strip offensive, and said that could be proven by any U.N. investigation.

Responding to a letter from Arab envoys, the International Atomic Energy Agency said on Tuesday it would consult with member states on the diplomats’ demand for a probe into whether Israeli attacks on Gaza might have featured the controversial munitions, which can leave dangerous radioactive debris.

“I deny this completely,” Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said, adding that such allegations were “no more than a recurring motif of anti-Israel propaganda”.

Israel has also been fending off accusations that it unlawfully used white-phosphorous shells, which can cause severe burns, for the 22-day assault on the Palestinian territory.

Depleted uranium is used in weapons because it can penetrate tanks and armour more easily due to its density and other physical properties.

It is a particular health risk around impact sites, where dust can get into people’s lungs and vital organs. It also has civilian uses in medical equipment and is used in radiation shields.

Israel was accused of using depleted uranium during its 2006 offensive against Lebanese Hezbollah guerrillas. Palmor said a U.N. investigation failed to find any evidence of that.

“Should they decide to hassle the U.N. inspectors again, they’ll get the same results,” he said.

The IAEA has in the past contributed to studies on depleted uranium traces from ammunition in the Balkans which found it was highly unlikely that a reported increase in cancer risks there could be linked to the traces. (Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Alison Williams)

This story has been all over the news recently and in fact there hundreds of stories dealing with the accusations that Israel used depleted uranium in the weapons used in their most recent Gaza offensive.  Various Muslim countries are claiming that uranium was used in the weapons, Israel claims that there were no uranium-based munitions, the IAEA says it may investigate, human rights groups are up in arms etc etc.

Personally, I don’t know enough about the recent raid to know whether or not it was justified and whether or not it was carried out within reasonable constraints to avoid undue civillian impact.  Israel has been fighting for most of its history to just have some basic safety and lets not forget that the West Bank and Gaza Strip are filled with militants who would not be allowed to continue to exist in any other context period.

I tend to doubt that the weapons used in the most recent skirmish contained uranium.  DU tends to be reserved for armor-penitrators because of the unique physical characteristics of the material that make it perfect for cutting through a tank like a hot knife through butter.   However, it is possible that a few armor penitrator rounds may have been used or that DU may have been incorporated into the ballast of a bomb or the nose of a projectile, either to add weight or improve penetration capabilities or both.   Much as I doubt it, it’s not beyond the relhm of possibility. (more…)

I guess the kids in the next town from me should be all dead soon…

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

I happen to live about two miles from Madison CT.

From the New Haven Register:

Uranium found in Madison water

MADISON — District officials will disable all water fountains at two schools and supply bottled water for drinking and cooking purposes after the schools’ water tested positive for elevated uranium levels.

Superintendent of Schools David Klein advised parents Friday that uranium, a mildly radioactive substance that can cause kidney disease, was found Thursday in water at both Kathleen H. Ryerson Elementary School and Dr. Robert H. Brown Middle School.

The uranium level was found to be 110 parts per billion, more than three times the standard accepted by the federal Environmental Protection Agency for public water systems that supply homes, Klein said.

There is no standard for schools, and no testing is required for schools, said Brian Toal, an epidemiologist at the state Department of Public Health.

The tests were done after an anonymous source told school officials Oct. 28 that elevated uranium levels were found in the groundwater at a nearby property.

The Department of Public Health does not expect people who consumed the water to suffer any adverse health effects, Toal said Friday.

As a precaution, town employees will disconnect all water fountains this weekend and begin using water coolers in the halls and kitchens beginning Monday and until further notice, Klein said.

“I think the school district is responding very thoughtfully. We’ve responded expeditiously, and I think we’ve put together a plan, starting Monday, that is all about the safety of the occupants of the schools,” he said.

For the first week, the coolers will cost the school district about $555, Director of Facilities Bill McMinn said. He said he will determine future orders based on consumption.

No other Madison schools were affected because their water is provided by the Connecticut Water Company, which tests for uranium and other impurities, Klein and Department of Public Health Director John Bowers said.

Toal said students and staff exposed to the uranium need not take any action.

He said he has seen levels in Connecticut of more than 1,000 parts per billion not cause adverse effects.

“We just don’t want people, parents, to be overly concerned. If their children were drinking a reasonable amount of water, … we would not expect any adverse effects and there’s no medical testing that would be recommended or even be useful,” Toal said.

Usually, in situations when there are elevated uranium levels, building owners drill a new well or install a filtration device, Toal said.

“We will be continuing to talk to the state Health Department about any further action that we can take,” Bowers said. “Treatment is going to be very difficult.”

Klein said he has not determined the probable cost of supplying water to the schools, and remedying the uranium levels, or where the money would come from in the budget.

“We just wanted to make sure we did the responsible thing and we will find the money to do the right thing,” Klein said.

Several parents Friday said that although they were somewhat concerned about the uranium levels, they were confident in the administration’s ability to handle the problem.

Maggie Mayer, a parent of students at both schools, said that while she found the news startling, she trusted that the situation would be handled and would not result in any health problems for her children.

“I think what did concern me is the possibility that they haven’t been testing the water all along,” Mayer said, adding that she wished school officials had taken action when the tip came in Oct. 28. “I understand that they probably didn’t even think that this was a concern, but that’s two more weeks of exposure that the kids didn’t need to have.”

A meeting, where residents can ask questions and discuss concerns, is scheduled for 7 p.m. Monday in the Brown Middle School auditorium.

It was mentioned on the news that the “source of the uranium has not yet been determined.”   Well, I can tell you what the source is right now:  the local geology.   Yes, that’s right.   Uranium, as far as minerals go, is just not rare at all.  It’s actually quite common to find uranium in a variety of rock and soil types.

The fact that the levels are “three times higher” than the federal standard for residential drinking water shouldn’t really be any reason for concern.   The standards are set very conservatively and considering that most kids would be limited to a few sips from a drinking fountain, the exposure is basically neglidgable.   110 ppb is a bit higher than normal but still not really high enough to really get worried about.

Another thing to consider is that many of the students from this school likely go home to drink from wells that have just as much uranium in the water, if not more.   All things considered, bringing in bottled water seems a bit silly and expensive.   However, I can’t fault the school for feeling the need to.   I’m sure that if they did not immediately shut off the “uranium” water fountains there would be plenty of parents screaming bloody murder about it.

Of course, if you go by the word of those who believe that Iraq, Afgahnistan and Bosnia are all contaminated forever and full of victums of depleted uranium, then shouldn’t all the students be dead by now?   Or at least have some kind of hideous tumor growing on their head or something?   Guess not.

Do people even bother reading before commenting or emailing?

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

There have been some comments that have shown up here that seem to indicate that the person making the comment has either not read the post they are refering to, perhaps just seeing the headline, or that they may have skimmed a few words off of it but really took iniative to actually read the content.   This can be annoying, but it’s especially annoying when someone demands answers to something that is addressed right there infront of them, practically staring them in the face.

I happened to get an email recently, which shows that someone found this site and managed to navigate to the contact page, but also seems to have read almost nothing else.

Here’s the relevant portion of it, coming from someone who said they found my site and thought I might be able to answer an important question:

(more…)

“Known Illnesses” supposedly caused by depleted uranium

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

From a website claiming to be an authority on depleted uranium.   If this is true, then anyone who lives within several miles of a coal-fired power plant, a farm where phosphate fertilizer is used, a chunk of granite or a bag of kitty litter must be in some very severe trouble.

“DU-Diagnosis List of Medical Illnesses Inhalation and Swallowing Of DU Particles”:

(more…)

More progress in Identifying “Depleted Uranium Deformaties” Images

Friday, October 17th, 2008

As anyone here knows, I take a real lot of offense to the use of images which show deformed, injured, sick or dead young children and babies with the claim that they are depleted uranium related.   They’re not and its very disrespectful and exploitative of these real examples of pain and suffering to use them for political gains or to try to silence critics by invoking gut wrenching images.

I had previously mentioned that after a great deal of searching I had identified at least a couple of the images, one coming from a medical museum and another dating to the 1960’s.

I recently was able to use the internet archive to demonstrate that a large number of images which are related to the topic can be sourced back to at least the year 2000. They were used at the time in an anti depleted-uranium page in the context of the 1991 Gulf War.  This was before the majority of the insanity on the topic hit, but a few pages were starting the crusade of stupid.

Obviously simply showing that many of the common images were in circulation before the invasion of Iraq or Afgahnistan does not prove that they were not taken in countries where the munitions were used, but it does show that the majority of newer websites have misrepresented them, as they are often cited as relating to the more recent military activities.

It may not be possible to track down all of the images being used, as almost any photo of a deformed baby or stillbirth seems to be fair game for the liars and wack jobs out there, but a few, such as those on the above mentioned page have become the most commonly disseminated images which are used to enforce these false claims.

Anyone who sees images which are claimed to be from depleted uranium and recognizes the image as coming from a relief project, a medical textbook, a stock photo source, documentary etc or has any information, help is always appreciated.

While it is unpleasant to deal with these images, if they can be placed to their original source it may help in reducing their value in misinforming and obscuring the truth about life and health in war torn and impoverished  regions of the world.  Above all else, reducing the ability of these images to be used to reinforce lies and propaganda can help to restore dignity the injured and deceased shown and the families who’s suffering has been exploited.

Depleted Uranium Image Claims

Thursday, October 9th, 2008

Warning.  The following post contains some graphic images.   I have long been offended and disturbed by the graphic images which have been associated with depleted uranium which are clearly not caused by the use of depleted uranium.   Recently I’ve tried to source some of the more common images that have been put out with these claims.   This is some of what I have found thus far.   Any help identifying more would be appreciated:

(more…)

But High Energy Prices Are Good Because It Makes People Cut Back, right?

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008

In the UK, as in much of the world, the US included, high fuel prices are really starting to hit the lower classes hard. The price of fuel is becoming a major issue as winter approaches and with electricity and motor fuel costs rising an increasing number of working class people are feeling the pinch in a major way.

Here’s an article in the Daily Mail, (which admittedly is not the most objective information source around):

(more…)