Organic food: It’s supposed to be a whole different way of growing food to make it a lot better for you, but really it’s just a set of restrictions which limit growers to using fertilizers and insect control methods that are deemed as somehow being “natural.” Of course, the food is basically the same, other than the fact that organic foods tend to take more energy, water, land and effort to grow and are often slightly lower in proteins or other nutrients.
Via the Salt Lake Tribune:
Study: Songbirds prefer conventionally grown wheat to organic
Increasingly each year, humans foraging in American supermarkets select organically grown food. Not so with wild songbirds searching for sustenance in the gardens of England.
Given a choice between organically and conventionally grown wheat, they opt for the conventional stuff — which is higher in protein — 55 to 60 percent of the time, a study has found.
The findings, which were published in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture on Tuesday, raise yet again the question of which is healthier: organic or conventional food.
The research team, based at the school of biology at Newcastle University in England, didn’t expect the birds to prefer conventionally grown wheat, said lead researcher Ailsa McKenzie. Earlier lab studies had reported that hens and rats preferred organically grown beetroot and wheat over conventionally grown.
But the problem with earlier preference studies, said McKenzie, is that none tested animals for longer than seven days, which meant that the animals did not have time to establish a preference.
“Birds learn,” she said. “They need to associate what they’re eating with where it is to learn a preference.”
In the Newcastle study, researchers positioned two feeders — one stocked with organic wheat and another with conventionally grown wheat — in 36 English gardens. Then over a period of six weeks in 2008, they measured how much wheat birds ate by gauging every two days how much food was consumed from each feeder.
The scientists conducted a second test in early 2009, this time studying 15 gardens over eight weeks. They also tested preferences among canaries in the laboratory.
All three trials found a preference for the conventionally grown food. In the 2008 trial, for example, the birds consumed 58,954 grams of wheat, 45 percent of it organic and 55 percent conventional.
The higher protein content of the conventional wheat — about 10 percent greater than the organic wheat’s — “most likely” accounted for the birds’ liking it better, the scientists wrote.
Conventionally grown crops are usually treated with fertilizers that deliver higher levels of nitrogen to plants than organic fertilizers do, in a form that can be processed more quickly. Plants use nitrogen to produce protein.
What the findings mean for humans is unclear.
“Our results suggest that the current dogma that organic food is preferred to conventional food may not always be true, which is of considerable importance for consumer perceptions of organically grown food,” the report concludes.
Advocates of organic farming beg to differ.
“For a team of scientists to extrapolate from a modest difference in what birds selected to make a statement that consumer perception should change is ludicrous,” said Charles Benbrook, chief scientist at the Organic Center, a research organization in Boulder, Colo., that promotes “the conversion of agriculture to organic methods,” according to its website.
The results are interesting, although they don’t really prove anything new. In fact, they’re pretty much what you would expect. The ratio of 45% to 55% suggests that the birds really didn’t have a huge preference one way or the other, but in general perfected the more protein-rich food.
It is interesting, however, to find that the birds preferred the slightly higher protein from conventional wheat, as it suggests that birds are capable of detecting protein levels. This says more about bird behavior and biology than organic farming, of course. One would expect that if the two samples had been closer in protein content, such as in a crop that was less dependent on nitrogen fertilizer, the ratio would likely be closer to 50/50.
The best conclusion that can be drawn from this is that birds, are generally not capable of reading and therefore are not enticed by the marketing material produced by organic farming advocates. They may need to consider some more bird-oriented publicity programs.