Also waiting for checks from big nuclear, big biotech, big chemical, big pharma, big moon hoax fakers and probably a few others.

        Perry said:

The writer of this piece is just yet another hit man. All hit men operate in the same manner. They mock
and ridicule and attempt to make it look as if their opponent is completely without credibility.

They do this with religion, alternative medicine, anyone that doesn’t believe in the whole HIV=AIDS hoax,etc.
The guy that runs Quackbusters is another of these hitmen. The hit men do not want you to know that there are thousands upon thousands of studies that prove that fluoride is harmful, that HIV is not the cause of AIDS, that
GMO foods are killing us slowly, that nuclear testing through out the 1940s-1960s caused and is still causing millions of cancers ever year. These hit men are of the devil, which of course they will deny he exists.

So who do you figure is paying me? I’d love to hear your theory on this. This should be good.

True to form, you are.

        Perry said:

The writer of this piece is just yet another hit man. yap,yap,yap These hit men are of the devil, which of course they will deny he exists.

Off the meds again eh, Perry

They do this with religion, alternative medicine, anyone that doesn’t believe in the whole HIV=AIDS hoax,etc.
The guy that runs Quackbusters is another of these hitmen. The hit men do not want you to know that there are thousands upon thousands of studies that prove that fluoride is harmful, that HIV is not the cause of AIDS, that
GMO foods are killing us slowly, that nuclear testing through out the 1940s-1960s caused and is still causing millions of cancers ever year. These hit men are of the devil, which of course they will deny he exists.

        Reality Checks said:

By now I suspect many of you are eating your own words,

um.. no. Keep waiting.

Um… Seriously? This was written in 2008 (I can’t believe it’s been 3 years). It’s not 2011.

What has changed in terms of wireless systems and infrastructure? Erm.. not a lot. The last vestidges of analog cellular were retired. The US ended regular analog television broadcasts. These, of course, would all reduce, not increase “radiation” levels.

3G coverage has improved a bit with some additional expansion. 4G systems have been introduced, but they are currently deployed to a fairly limited extent. There has been a fair amount of infrastructure expansion in China and a few other places. Not much expansion in the US and almost none in Europe (since nearly complete coverage was achieved some time ago.)

I guess there are probably a few more wifi routers operating today than there were in 2008.

Hundreds of times higher than three years ago? You’ve got to be kidding me.

I do freelance and contract work on network adminstration, IT installaton etc. I also have a part time job for a company that provides vocational work to disabled adults. I do their ecommerace and database stuff.

Why do you want to know?

Um… well I have some polin alergies, although I always had those. About a year ago I got pretty sick with a low grade fever that lasted a couple of days. Uh.. I think I had a very minor cold this winter.

Other than that I’ve been in perfect health. Nope, no headaches. No diziness. I do get fattigue and tireness, but that’s usually a result of staying out too late or too much work and/or partying.

Don’t have any children, but my family is fine, thanks for asking.

Well, no, I suppose not in general – I mean, it’s a dangerous world. One of them could get sick or have an accident. Nobody’s wel being is gauranteed.

But as far as wireless devices and “radiation” then yes, I’m pretty damn certain they’re fine in that regard.

Good advice, but I’ve already done both

        mindy.eastwell said:

Since 2008, studies around the world have proved CELL TOWERS CAUSE CANCER.

Citation? I’ve seen all kinds of studies, many with reports that they show cancer linked to cell towers or cell phones. I’ve read them (the studies, not just the media reports) Still have not seen anything, but I’m always open to new evidence.

However, even if they did cause cancer (which they don’t), there’s a huge difference between something having chronic carsonegeic effects versus acute effects, like producing headaches, fattigue etc. They absolutely, definately, provably do not do the later.

It’s not terribly hard to test either. Put a lot of people in a rooms with a transmitters. Don’t tell them if they are powered on or not. Record the results.

Guess what, it’s been done. Nothing there.

Uh… no.

Cancer is still a fairly common condition in humans. The chances that you will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in your life is more than one third. The chances of dying from it are clost to 20%.

There has been no increase in cancer rates. There has, however, been a signifficant change in cancer mortality: It’s down. For some cancers, it’s down quite a lot in just the past 20 years.

No, there is no increase in cancer. Sorry.

well, there already are and always have been. Not that this has anything to do with cell phones. There are just a lot of ignoramuses in the world and always have been.

People are having all kinds of different types of reactions to cell tower radiation exposure, and Mr. Firstenberg is still doing everyone else in the country a favor by attacking this corporate takeover in any way he can. We should be THANKING him, not slandering him.

We now have a documentary called “Full Signal” that is full of facts and doctors from around the world. It is very educational and should be watched by everyone who doesn’t know about the effects of cell tower radiation. If we continue to let the cell phone companies compete with each other at the cost of our childrens’ health, there is going to be a very large population of regretful, ignorant, sick people in the very near future.

Ignorance is our biggest predator.

        drbuzz0 said:

Honestly, I don’t know how the hell he managed to worm his way into that job to begin with.

All I can think is he BS’ed his way into it with a padded resume or he had some connections who got him the job. His experience before that was limited to pulling a similar stunt with silicone breast implants.

(yeah, we all know how good the science that destroyed Dow Corning and many retirements was.

It’s probably the best example of panic over non-existent dangers going wild in recent history).

What about the anti-nuclear movement, aren’t they even bigger than that?

Global warming has a lot of scientific evidence that supports its existence and the fact that we are causing it and basically nothing against (and for an increased CO2 concentration in the atmosphere to not cause global warming a lot of very well tested basic physics must be wrong).

The idea of mobile phones causing cancer contradicts pretty much everything we know about electromagnetic radiation.